From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Mar  7  1:42: 1 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C9337B719
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Mar 2001 01:41:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl)
Received: (from stijn@localhost)
	by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f279dgw30360;
	Wed, 7 Mar 2001 10:39:42 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from stijn)
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 10:39:42 +0100
From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How's the latest snaphot?
Message-ID: <20010307103942.B14261@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
References: <200103070935.f279ZXI62054@ns1.unixathome.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200103070935.f279ZXI62054@ns1.unixathome.org>; from dan@langille.org on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 10:35:33PM +1300
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 10:35:33PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
> Tomorrow I'm going to install a stable snaphot on a client's box.  I've 
> seen some issues lately in the list.  All of which seem to have been 
> resolved lately.  I'm wondering if I should be going for 4.2-20010306-
> STABLE or 4.2-20010303-STABLE.

I'm running 4.3-20010306-BETA successfully, with the CPUTYPE optimizations.

HTH,

--Stijn

-- 
Nostalgia ain't what it used to be.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message