From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 31 08:37:26 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id IAA05965 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 31 Dec 1996 08:37:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from cincy5.dcro.dla.mil ([33.19.104.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id IAA05959 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 1996 08:37:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from tensbum (col-oh6-20.ix.netcom.com [199.183.200.212]) by cincy5.dcro.dla.mil (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id LAA11935 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 1996 11:32:29 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199612311632.LAA11935@cincy5.dcro.dla.mil> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Michael P. Deslippe" Organization: Defense Contract Management Command To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 11:35:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: System Similarities Reply-to: bgy2452@cincy5.dcro.dla.mil X-Confirm-Reading-To: bgy2452@lists.dcro.dla.mil X-pmrqc: 1 Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.50) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm not sure this is the right LIST for this question. When installing third-party software, most installation instructions quote a plethora of generic UNIX-similar systems. When using FreeBSD (2.1.6, in my case), which system do I use when FreeBSD is not called out? I have successfully uses BSD4.4 in the past, but my current project (QMail) only lists BSDI 2.0 that appears close. Am I safe in following instructions for installing BSDI 2.x applications? ---Mike