From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 1 16:54:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59D516A40F for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 16:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bfkorvem@caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca) Received: from caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca (caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.186.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5827F43D68 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 16:54:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfkorvem@caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca) Received: by caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B3AC733C2E; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 12:54:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 12:54:48 -0400 From: Ben Korvemaker To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060701165448.GA15063@caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <20060629163256.GE46135@caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca> <02829617@serv3.int.kfs.ru> <20060630121917.GG46135@caml.cs.uwaterloo.ca> <70662128@serv3.int.kfs.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70662128@serv3.int.kfs.ru> X-Face: "c*(tD4>ppZ2.~$,F<81P?w)^9&*|($,^6W5}jc=M|-l)9W@HDGDesB?,VE'R|@u-W=/zi=mL?{.I[P&V9$YdV2O-RxdNkov_I_E0(.1a User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: linux-org-libs port downloading xorg-x11-6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2.1.src.rpm, not using it X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 16:54:49 -0000 On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 05:55:43PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > No (look at the undelined text). We should do it to be > GPL-compatible. BTW, there are some ports marked as BROKEN because > they don't fetch GPLed linux sources... Ok. I suspected as much, but hoped I might be wrong. It'd be nice if there was a variable you could set to avoid such downloads, like: .if !defined(WITHOUT_GPL_SOURCE_FOR_BINARIES) SRC_DISTFILES= xorg-x11-6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2.1.src.rpm .endif but I've not been following enough lists long enough to know if such a thing would be acceptable. Odd that it only seems to happen if you do 'portupgrade -F' ahead of time, but not if you're just upgrading with 'portupgrade -pr'. > Cvsup will overwrite the patch. Fair enough. Ben -- Ben Korvemaker Public Key Fingerprint: bfkorvem@uwaterloo.ca 575B 6BE9 DFE4 0E83 8AA8 6C22 F703 9777 5321 837B