From owner-freebsd-isp  Wed Jul 30 21:12:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA00462
          for isp-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 21:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.interpla.net (root@earth.blacksburg.net [207.198.61.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA00454
          for <isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 21:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beta1.blacksburg.net (pluto.blacksburg.net [207.198.61.12]) by earth.interpla.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA16110 for <isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:12:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970731001518.00cbe29c@mail.blacksburg.net>
X-Sender: evansl@mail.blacksburg.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:15:18 -0400
To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Lyle Evans <evansl@blacksburg.net>
Subject: xinetd vs TCP wrappers which is better?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

	There are two packages with seemingly similar function
xinetd and tcpd (TCP wrappers). Am I correct in that they do essentially
the same thing? Is there any advantage to using one over the other in
2.1.7 environment? Differences in resource utilization or security?
Pros or Cons.

TIA,
Lyle Evans 
evansl@blacksburg.net