From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 13:21:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A7D106568F for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe06.c2i.net [212.247.154.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDE28FC1D for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:21:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=XR4AdwVFe5G+K9PtySS1/JOnv6WK/hruile8wX/SUjk= c=1 sm=1 a=SvYTsOw2Z4kA:10 a=jMiN5JlfOkEA:10 a=WQU8e4WWZSUA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=CL8lFSKtTFcA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:17 a=E1A9lCBeHkyaW-aH_QgA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:117 Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe06.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 162290211; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:11:33 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 15:09:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: *nPdTl_}RuAI6^PVpA02T?$%Xa^>@hE0uyUIoiha$pC:9TVgl.Oq, NwSZ4V"|LR.+tj}g5 %V,x^qOs~mnU3]Gn; cQLv&.N>TrxmSFf+p6(30a/{)KUU!s}w\IhQBj}[g}bj0I3^glmC( :AuzV9:.hESm-x4h240C`9=w MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201108091509.23928.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Robert McKenzie Subject: Re: sane hal and configuring a Canon CanoScan N650U X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:21:38 -0000 On Tuesday 09 August 2011 07:48:17 Robert McKenzie wrote: > I am just wondering if anyone has any ideas as to who to get such a > combination working as I have despite much effort, not been able to do so. > > The device is visible, the permissions for the device appear to be correct > with the details as follows. > > Using sane-find-scanners I get the following > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9, product=0x2206) at /dev/uscanner0 > > Then when I try the next stage of trying scanimage -L, all I get is core > dumping. > What is the backtrace of the core dump if you open it with gdb ? gdb file scanimage core scanimage.core bt --HPS