Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Jul 2016 02:04:58 -0400
From:      Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 11-Beta1 problem with virtual KVM
Message-ID:  <373b3dac-fce8-f599-9d1c-cf65b5d0ebfd@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1607130709540.10999@laptop.wojtek.intra>
References:  <4dc72d13-bdbf-3947-0564-4e8553475b17@denninger.net> <CAPed3OG9sa-F_t%2B%2BwTFHydBgHNO20cc_w6eaC7qVOU72rbHRsw@mail.gmail.com> <4e137b8a-4dd4-10c9-7843-83452c217a70@denninger.net> <bd5decf7-7757-2591-783e-998399ad220a@FreeBSD.org> <27ab24b9-ef8c-0ce5-c70b-d7fe3a201946@denninger.net> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1607130709540.10999@laptop.wojtek.intra>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2016-07-13 01:10, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>>
>>> That will at least narrow down the problem to the new vt(4).
>> kern.vty="sc" returns me to a reasonable console that works properly
>> over the KVM.
> anyway - does it make any sense to use vt(4) on servers, where only text
> console is needed?
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

It is the default, and it should work.

-- 
Allan Jude



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?373b3dac-fce8-f599-9d1c-cf65b5d0ebfd>