From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 15 13:27:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008B816A4CE; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:27:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BFE43D1D; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:27:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 5F0F414718; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:27:57 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:27:57 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20040215203341.GC53260@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Paul Murphy cc: marcus@FreeBSD.ORG cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: ghostscript-afpl vs ghostscript-gnu X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:27:58 -0000 > Eww, how did this superfluous variable get into bsd.port.mk? You're > supposed to use GHOSTSCRIPT_PORT to specify which of the n ghostscript > ports you want to use. As ports/36112, which was originally someone else's PR, but one on which you had commented "this patch needs to be reworked for the current bsd.port.mk" which I then did. See audit log for details. You've got my permission to change it if you hate it. mcl