Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:58:54 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Fesenko <f0andrey@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS should prefer the most specific... or something. Message-ID: <20170227115854.GK15630@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CACpH0MdQKuHD9XNRh=VYa6nHh5YpQnpa-yjmHyk08j7mZUEg1g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACpH0Meg5MjOGCohSMrAdwdRG_smVNY6CNVRaUSXw9cq0x2YsA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BK5SrP=p7xqFOjPM4BvDuyitM951biu8ZNoKuin8A_TfeG1xQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACpH0MdQKuHD9XNRh=VYa6nHh5YpQnpa-yjmHyk08j7mZUEg1g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 08:28:08PM -0500, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Fesenko <f0andrey@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > "A disk can be specified by a full path to the device or the geom(4) > > provider name" see zpool(8) > > For example gpt lables > > > > > Yeah, no. You didn't read carefully. Let me be more clear. Some random > rejig of device names causes zfs to abandon your carefully constructed > name. GPT and GPT labels are more stable, but some machines will not allow > a GPT label. Anyways, after the random event, you have maximally long, > low-signal-to-noise ratio names. zfs don't need label, zfs can use raw disk name and full tolerante to change this names between reboot. ps: /boot/loader.conf: kern.geom.label.gptid.enable="0" kern.geom.label.disk_ident.enable=0
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170227115854.GK15630>