From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Mar 31 12: 4:29 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from et-gw.etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C987F37B71A; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:04:26 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dennis@etinc.com)
Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18])
	by et-gw.etinc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA03742;
	Sat, 31 Mar 2001 15:05:36 GMT
	(envelope-from dennis@etinc.com)
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010331151458.0220ab10@mail.etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@mail.etinc.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 15:23:09 -0500
To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2.
In-Reply-To: <20010331111813.A90993@hub.freebsd.org>
References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FD9AD0@l04.research.kpn.com>
 <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FD9AD0@l04.research.kpn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 02:18 PM 03/31/2001, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 08:49:55PM +0100, Koster, K.J. wrote:
> > Its not a "proprietary tree". I dont have time to clean it up
> > and submit patches.
>
>But you do seem to have time to keep arguing with people???
>I'm sure you'll have time to bitch again if 4.4 doesn't meet your needs
>because you didn't submit some patch you needed.

Only because the same morons (like yourself) continue ad infinitum to post 
your useless comments publicly.

Dennis



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message