From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 10 16:09:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D4A16A46B for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A2013C46A for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6AG82L8066366; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:08:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id l6AG82mp066365; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:08:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:08:02 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20070710160802.GA66351@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20070710044902.GA62286@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20070710155313.GB2730@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070710155313.GB2730@soaustin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Closing some old bug reports. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:09:34 -0000 On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:53:13AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 09:49:02PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > These have out lived their shelf life. > > Done. fwiw, you can always email bugmeister@FreeBSD.org with these > type of requests and we'll clean them up. Then only bugmeister will see the list of PR. > Out of curiosity, did the problems get resolved in later releases, or ...? > (I only saw the one commit that fixed a problem in the list, but some were > so old they would not have gotten the auto-annotation from the commit.) AFAIK, only one was fixed. -- Steve