Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:27:54 +0900 (JST)
From:      Maho NAKATA <maho@FreeBSD.org>
To:        bapt@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        office@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Making COMPAT_TEXTCAT=yes default for textproc/libexttextcat
Message-ID:  <20121107.092754.1814606820591908831.maho@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20121105095742.GF66354@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <20121105.161949.1478315555908952367.maho@FreeBSD.org> <20121105095742.GF66354@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Bapt

thanks for your reply. Now I verified, too.
> Normally since 3.3.1_1 libexttextcat and libtextcat should be able to coexists
> without conflicts the conflict line has been removed from libextextcat. (Is
> there any conflict left?)
Thanks, I'll remove soon.

Best
 Nakata Maho


From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Making COMPAT_TEXTCAT=yes default for textproc/libexttextcat
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:57:42 +0100

> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 04:19:49PM +0900, Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> Hi 
>> 
>> To co-exist editors/openoffice-3 and editors/libreoffice, 
>> is it okay to let COMPAT_TEXTCAT=yes default for textproc/libexttextcat?
>> What do you think?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>>  Nakata Maho
>> 
> 
> Normally since 3.3.1_1 libexttextcat and libtextcat should be able to coexists
> without conflicts the conflict line has been removed from libextextcat. (Is
> there any conflict left?)
> 
> 
> 
> regards,
> Bapt



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121107.092754.1814606820591908831.maho>