From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 11 12:37:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nyct.net (bsd4.nyct.net [204.141.86.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0136237BCCB for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 12:37:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mbac@nyct.net) Received: from bsd1.nyct.net (mbac@bsd1.nyct.net [204.141.86.3]) by mail.nyct.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA24237; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 15:37:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mbac@nyct.net) Received: from localhost (mbac@localhost) by bsd1.nyct.net (8.8.8/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA20441; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 15:37:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mbac@nyct.net) X-Authentication-Warning: bsd1.nyct.net: mbac owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 15:37:38 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Bacarella To: Julian Elischer Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD dead ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I'm not a doom-sayer, but try to understand this from our point of view. [..snip..] > does this clear up the difficulty for you? > did they need to clear this with you first? I had no difficulties in the first place. I entirely support this. I was just speculating as to why people could be upset, and what possible POVs they might have. Simply dismissing them as mal-intents is the wrong way to treat their confusion. -MB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message