From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 27 03:30:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9278016A421; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 03:30:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2061643D46; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 03:30:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9R3U8qR032618; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:30:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:30:07 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20051026.213007.38907217.imp@bsdimp.com> To: thierry@herbelot.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200510262206.12508.thierry@herbelot.com> References: <20051026194801.0625816A421@hub.freebsd.org> <200510262206.12508.thierry@herbelot.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:30:08 -0600 (MDT) Cc: wpaul@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error messages with ed(4) and current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 03:30:22 -0000 In message: <200510262206.12508.thierry@herbelot.com> Thierry Herbelot writes: : then I've got one more bogus NIC on the same machine (this one PCI-based) : : ed1: flags=8802 mtu 1500 : ether 52:54:00:e5:36:06 Can you send me a dmesg for this board? : as all of these are just junk chinese old NIC's, a snafu from the manufacturer : could also be a valid explanation. I believe that's unlikely... Warner