From owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Sun Jun 18 12:02:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07209D900E7 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E953B6ACE0 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v5IC2igr006593 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:02:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220078] [patch] [panic] [ipfw] repeatable kernel panic due to unlocked INADDR_TO_IFP usage Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:02:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:02:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220078 --- Comment #5 from Eugene Grosbein --- (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #4) I've just rebuilt the kernel with your version of patch instead of old one = and restarted my tests. New version does basically same thing, so I do not expe= ct problems. The system exhibited no problems at all during a day with my stre= ss test using all patches involving (for kernel, libc and mpd itself). Unless something bad happens next day, I'm going to put it in "testing production". --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=