From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Dec 20 1: 2:26 2000 From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 20 01:02:24 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9E937B400 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 01:02:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfx-64-6-211-149.users.reflexcom.com ([64.6.211.149]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Wed, 20 Dec 2000 01:00:44 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-64-6-211-149.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBK92Fe55027; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 01:02:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 01:02:15 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Stephen McKay , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No cable modems?? Message-ID: <20001220010215.R96105@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <20001219182739.C61697@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> <200012200518.eBK5IsB15659@dungeon.home> <20001220003436.A345@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> <20001219233320.O96105@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <20001220024129.A2993@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> <20001220003306.P96105@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <20001220035135.A3783@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20001220035135.A3783@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com>; from dmaddox@sc.rr.com on Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 03:51:35AM -0500 Sender: cjc@rfx-64-6-211-149.users.reflexcom.com Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 03:51:35AM -0500, Donald J . Maddox wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:33:06AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 02:41:29AM -0500, Donald J . Maddox wrote: [snip] > > OK, here is the piece that would be of interest, > > > > > Received: from Mail6.sc.rr.com (fe6.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.53]) > > > by alum.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id CAA19042 > > > for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 02:41:18 -0500 (EST) [snip] > > However, this might be trouble, > > > > $ dig Mail6.sc.rr.com > > > > ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> Mail6.sc.rr.com > > ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > > ;; got answer: > > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4 > > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2 > > ;; QUERY SECTION: > > ;; Mail6.sc.rr.com, type = A, class = IN > > > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > > Mail6.sc.rr.com. 23h56m20s IN A 24.93.67.181 > > . > > . > > . > > > > Your mailserver seems to be using a name, Mail6.sc.rr.com, that does > > not agree with the IP, 24.93.67.53 (or vice versa). > > > > Still, it's weird. You might want to consider a mail to the > > 'postmaster's at both ISPs. They should really work this out. It looks > > I don't really see anything unusual about this... It's pretty common > for mail.whatever.domain to be an alias, no? I think every ISP I have > ever used had a mail gateway called mail*.whatever.domain that resolved > to some other host than 'mail'. Yeah, that is common, but that's not what is happening here. The name and address do not match. You would expect it is possible multiple names to map to one IP address, but here we have a machine giving a name which corresponds to a _different_ IP than the one from which the connection is coming. It looks like it is lying about being Mail6.sc.rr.com. But I am not sure if that is even the problem or not. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message