From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 17:40:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6B416A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:40:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB1543D45 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:40:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9RHeTpt090341 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:40:29 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9RHeTiS090340; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:40:29 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:40:29 GMT Message-Id: <200410271740.i9RHeTiS090340@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: kern/73202: IPF causing major tcp problems with 3rd party apps (apache, exim etc) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kris Kennaway List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:40:29 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/73202; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kris Kennaway To: David Haworth Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/73202: IPF causing major tcp problems with 3rd party apps (apache, exim etc) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:38:06 -0700 On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:23:14PM +0100, David Haworth wrote: > I eventually determined it to be a network issue. using tethereal, I > could see a http connection come in, the three way handshake would > be completed (syn, synack, ack) and then the server would simply > stop responding. the client would keep retrying until it gave > up. the server process was obviously getting the request (ie the > apache logging and the exim process spawning) but could not reply > for some reason. First guess would be that your ipf ruleset was wrong. Can you please include it for verification? Kris