Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed,  9 Sep 1998 11:55:04 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Tony Kimball <anthony.kimball@east.sun.com>
To:        nate@mt.sri.com
Cc:        freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Daemonising a Java Process: Possible?
Message-ID:  <13814.45333.5280.235552@compound.east>
References:  <13813.27934.606377.693358@compound.east> <199809082154.WAA00626@fdy2.demon.co.uk> <199809091441.IAA13097@mt.sri.com> <13814.41946.450831.565822@compound.east> <199809091609.KAA14035@mt.sri.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoth Nate Williams on Wed, 9 September:
: > I ended up relying upon the towerized native version of
: > the pizza compiler, since javac was so buggy (both on solaris and
: > fbsd) and interpreted was so slow (on bsd).
: 
: Can you qualify that statement?  In my experience, we've had more
: problems with the pizza compiler than the Solaris compiler.

Specifically, I have a large code on which javac will loop in the
presence of most kinds of syntax errors.  Pizza does not deal well
with circular interface dependencies, so that I have typically needed
to bootstrap with javac, but thereafter pizza has been the more direct
route to solution.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13814.45333.5280.235552>