From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:50:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7460B16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:50:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E6E43D4C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:50:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7HoIR9015361 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:50:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jA7HoIEF015360; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:50:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:50:18 GMT Message-Id: <200511071750.jA7HoIEF015360@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Boris Samorodov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/88291: [update] devel/smc: UNBREAK port (size mismatch) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Boris Samorodov List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:50:19 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/88291; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Boris Samorodov To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/88291: [update] devel/smc: UNBREAK port (size mismatch) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:47:27 +0300 On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:29:11 +0100 Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > You should try to ask software developers what happened to tarball > and provide this info in PR. I've got an answer at the ML at sourceforge.net: ----- From: Charles Rapp Subject: RE: Was 4.2.2 rerolled? Boris, I realized after the initial release that the build missed 1 line change of the C# bug fix due to a CVS problem. SmcCSharpGenerator.java, line 1456 was built as: if (loopbackFlag == false || hasActions == false) and was corrected to: if (loopbackFlag == false || hasActions == true) So I corrected the CVS problem, rebuilt and re-released the tarball without modifying the release. I apologize for any inconvience this has caused. Charles Rapp ----- WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider