From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 20:27:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FD716A424 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.fluidhosting.com (mail1.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83498444D5 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:00:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 15049 invoked by uid 399); 9 Aug 2005 20:00:23 -0000 Received: from 69-175-228-47.vnnyca.adelphia.net (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (dougb@dougbarton.net@69.175.228.47) by mail1.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 9 Aug 2005 20:00:23 -0000 Message-ID: <42F90B53.2060707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:00:19 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Emanuel Strobl References: <200508091723.42539@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <200508091723.42539@harrymail> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing in man make.conf and examples/etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:27:24 -0000 Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Hello, > > in 6.0-beta2 I'm missing at least three NO_... defines which are evaluated > but neither mentioned in the make.conf man page nor listed as examples in > shared/examples/etc/make.conf > Those are: > NO_HTML > NO_RESCUE > NO_FSCHG > > Shall I file a PR? Depends, where did you find these defines? There is a chance that the authors of those Makefiles did not intend them to be exposed to users, which is why they are not documented. A good place to get an idea of the author's intention is the CVS history of those files. hth, Doug