From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 6 09:31:22 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA09593 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 09:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (mexico.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.253]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA09588 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 09:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (brasil.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.33]) by mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id SAA03181 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 18:30:54 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (8.8.4/8.6.12) with UUCP id SAA29937 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 18:30:49 +0200 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.5/keltia-uucp-2.9) id QAA26137; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 16:14:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19970406161441.43355@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Sun, 6 Apr 1997 16:14:41 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sendmail in 2.2 References: <19970405162858.CA53416@uriah.heep.sax.de> <19970406094316.3731.qmail@suburbia.net> <19970406114927.GJ36371@uriah.heep.sax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.67 In-Reply-To: <19970406114927.GJ36371@uriah.heep.sax.de>; from J Wunsch on Sun, Apr 06, 1997 at 11:49:27AM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#3153 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to J Wunsch: > qmail handles UUCP now? > > If not, i have to forget it. The problem is not per se the transport mechanism (you can put the mail thru uux so UUCP is supported) but in the fact that if you try to manage a mailing-list with it thru UUCP, you'll end up sending as many individual messages as you have subscribers (i.e. multiply by N your phone bill). If it can be disabled now (this "one recipient per message" feature) then one of my biggest gripes about Qmail can be forgotten. The other ones (logs less informative than sendmail's, configuration mechanism, unreadable source code and author's attitude) can't be helped much I'm afraid. Haven't tried 1.0 though. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: There are no limits -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #41: Sun Mar 23 23:01:22 CET 1997