From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 16:57:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF87E106564A; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:57:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4D88FC0A; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA14083; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:57:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1R0G0m-000LfB-VT; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:57:36 +0300 Message-ID: <4E63ADFE.8080308@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:57:34 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110901 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marat N.Afanasyev" References: <4E5F6753.3070402@FreeBSD.org> <4E5F737F.1070703@ksu.ru> <4E5F799C.7030509@FreeBSD.org> <4E5F7B22.40604@freebsd.org> <4E609F9F.6080208@FreeBSD.org> <4E63A5C5.5090407@ksu.ru> In-Reply-To: <4E63A5C5.5090407@ksu.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, gecko@FreeBSD.org, Florian Smeets Subject: Re: firefox-6.0_1 spinning on a cpu X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:57:41 -0000 on 04/09/2011 19:22 Marat N.Afanasyev said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> The following patch for devel/nspr port fixes the problem for me: > > can you post a follow-up on > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156889 > with your patch? Will do. BTW, if I understand correctly what our elders say about this issue, then POLLHUP in this situation is a completely valid value, so we might want to raise this issue with the upstream. Adding POLLHUP to the checked flags will definitely help us and should not hurt any other operating systems. -- Andriy Gapon