From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 25 05:34:04 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288B3106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 25 May 2012 05:34:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com
	[74.125.82.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B4B8FC0C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 25 May 2012 05:34:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so431485wer.13
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 24 May 2012 22:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=jHsP0c+8LYat9QqCnrJWAsF9kcZ+2e2pZ8ndkS2Rr3w=;
	b=aMDfUGD4K2dch7NoRo+ua6G1RdmVnK3xGcEH3QpomIz5RPBZu9yJb8DMqDG/XHf6or
	QXecqQ9U6DnvO287ZdT8b8sb/Zsw+OW18CjRHnmP9QkDmHjQyNu9rC9zksEWXrN1Z6Mv
	hs5hpDrpo04uf15W6Vjb9+gBXcHzDT3/XNxIBGnniIGaDR8O4HVJYNkvXoUDfg2Ty7Ry
	hsW6DVl99fryCFJl/T2bpIaBGErPqVDgiGwvM7gW6i/YMfwbz+tC+tb/4HpdxARt9Ile
	SkYo6YaZezyjAUaUvP+rSu5tjKPvv4ju/WE+C5ZxthFCLCDO8OetGf5Cx+o4aRhtbycW
	GtlA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.213.219 with SMTP id a69mr1112984wep.16.1337924042532;
	Thu, 24 May 2012 22:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.88.155 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 22:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120525035108.a3af81c1.freebsd@edvax.de>
References: <4FBBF32D.9070505@dreamchaser.org>
	<20120522234510.a406941d.goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com>
	<4FBD7BA0.7070502@dreamchaser.org>
	<4FBEE05A.6000909@dreamchaser.org>
	<20120525035108.a3af81c1.freebsd@edvax.de>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 00:34:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+tpaK2Rwvg_G8veqh9bwV_KZPx6Tz4pxWr0cVh8ZbPEBg5=pg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: freebsd@dreamchaser.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: automating menu options in ports (and other ports build
	questions)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 05:34:04 -0000

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:

> On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:28:58 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
> > 3. Do the package builds use the defaults set in the ports tree?  If
> > not, how are the options for packages chosen, and how does one determine
> > what the package options are?
>
> They use the default options.


This is true for most ports at least, but perhaps not true for all of them.
 For example the QT4_OPTIONS controls some rather critical functionality
which is compiled into the packages however doesn't end up in a default
port install without other modification in make.conf.  It
wouldn't surprise me at all if there were a few port config screens that
didn't match a package's selected options.

-- 
Adam Vande More