From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 15:21:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E042216A403 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [81.56.186.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F97A43D46 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:21:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4C8751143B; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:20:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:20:12 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060930152012.GC19733@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: ports@freebsd.org References: <20060930133913.GA89767@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060930133913.GA89767@lpthe.jussieu.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Cc: Subject: Re: Yet another INDEX builder. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:21:54 -0000 Le Sam 30 sep 06 à 15:39:13 +0200, Michel Talon écrivait : > Also perhaps my disk is faster > > niobe% diskinfo -t /dev/ad0 > ... > Transfer rates: > outside: 102400 kbytes in 2.092096 sec = 48946 kbytes/sec > middle: 102400 kbytes in 2.429019 sec = 42157 kbytes/sec > inside: 102400 kbytes in 3.887401 sec = 26342 kbytes/sec No, but the difference does not seem to be noticeable: diskinfo -t /dev/ad11 ... Transfer rates: outside: 102400 kbytes in 1.623142 sec = 63088 kbytes/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 1.863105 sec = 54962 kbytes/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 2.884811 sec = 35496 kbytes/sec This is about 30 %. -- Th. Thomas.