Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:30:53 -0700 From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> To: clsung@FreeBSD.org Cc: drosih@rpi.edu Subject: Re: Ports: devel/svn dies at devel/apr Message-ID: <200410241630.i9OGUsF08010@windsor.research.att.com> References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC22021E005B@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <20041020062653.GA8027@FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw> <p0611040dbd9c7e7b4ac0@[128.113.24.47]> <200410232056.i9NKuKt24614@windsor.research.att.com> <p06110434bda0b8d7fb52@[128.113.24.47]> <20041024045122.GA20015@FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw> <20041024145529.GA67989@FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I think it (ports version) should works fine. > On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 09:43:34PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > That web page mentions: > > > > 2. Apply the patch appended to this email (which is r10438 > > of subversion trunk, and is expected to be present in > > 1.1.0rc3 and later). My big concern is a few lines up in the page: >>That said, if you are willing to accept that svn-1.x+apr-1.x will be ABI >>incompatible with 'normal' svn-1.x, we do try to make it work. I don't know what the implications of "ABI incompatible" are, but it sounds like it's possible that a port upgrade from 1.0.8+apr0.9 to 1.1.1+apr-1.0 will break someone's system. Bill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410241630.i9OGUsF08010>