From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 11:25:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5442B16A401 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:25:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mickey242@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A807213C4D5 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:25:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mickey242@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2008 11:25:30 -0000 Received: from port-ip-213-211-209-123.reverse.mdcc-fun.de (EHLO gunhead.enforcer.cc) [213.211.209.123] by mail.gmx.net (mp055) with SMTP; 22 Feb 2008 12:25:30 +0100 X-Authenticated: #8913523 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1906IBqkUJ07O/lMH5Uiz44V+aFVCMFk1XkPuCmmB f/IQblHYJsz1rL Message-ID: <47BEB12A.3090509@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:25:30 +0100 From: Andreas Wetzel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080216) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov References: <47BE9CBC.6010500@gmx.net> <20080222105025.GB94607@team.vega.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080222105025.GB94607@team.vega.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ThinkPad 600 - CardBus inoperative X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:25:33 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > I have ThinkPad 600X. Try setting hw.cbb.start_memory=0xd8000 > in /boot/loader.conf. I no longer have to use hw.pci.link.*.irq > hacks. Other than continuing regressions with ACPI suspend, it > feels good under -CURRENT for almost eight years now. ;) Lucky you. I have tried setting hw.cbb.start_memory=0xd8000, but it does not seem to make any difference. I guess there are subtle differences between the ThinkPad 600 and 600X. I already spent hours of googling to find a solution to this problem, but all I could find out, is that other OSes like Linux or NetBSD have had similar problems on this hardware. Not sure if they managed to fix it though. Surprisingly Windows has no problem with that machine, even running with ACPI HAL at all, apart from being *slow* :) -- Keep it icy man. I don't want to end up a corpse before my time because you were daydreaming.