From owner-freebsd-fs  Tue May 15  8: 9:36 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8A3AB37B423; Tue, 15 May 2001 08:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by aldan.algebra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4FFABt62656;
	Tue, 15 May 2001 11:10:14 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com)
Message-Id: <200105151510.f4FFABt62656@aldan.algebra.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 11:10:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [kris@obsecurity.org: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc]
To: bright@wintelcom.net
Cc: bsddiy@163.net, kris@obsecurity.org, grog@lemis.com,
	tlambert@primenet.com, mckusick@mckusick.com, ru@FreeBSD.org,
	fs@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <20010514225533.M2009@fw.wintelcom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

[cvs-lists removed from CC]
On 14 May, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Assuming your database is a serious production quality system it will
> implement its own style of data integrity and consistancy checking
> on top of the filesystems in case it happens to crash.

Is not this a slightly wrong attitude? Why does a serious production
quality database needs its own checking for problems, which can only
be come from OS if it runs on a serisous production quality OS?

	-mi



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message