From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Thu Jul 23 21:56:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989889A8D04 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:56:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 566301040 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:56:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIOTK-0005yl-8c; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:56:10 +0300 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:56:10 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: d@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-15:13.tcp Message-ID: <20150723215610.GR44094@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20150722025746.721831C32@freefall.freebsd.org> <20150722131856.GD43740@zxy.spb.ru> <55B140B5.8050904@delphij.net> <20150723204803.GE43740@zxy.spb.ru> <55B15DAB.7030905@delphij.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55B15DAB.7030905@delphij.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:56:14 -0000 On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:33:31PM -0700, Xin Li wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > (Bcc'ed some unnamed patch authors so they can correct me if I was wrong > ). > > On 07/23/15 13:48, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:57PM -0700, Xin Li wrote: > > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 > >> > >> On 07/22/15 06:18, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:57:46AM +0000, FreeBSD Security > >>> Advisories wrote: > >>> > >>> This is correspondent to kern/25986? Or kern/25986 is > >>> different bug? > >> > >> I think it's the same bug. > > > > I see patch in kern/25986 is different from SA. May be SA close not > > all issuses? > > Yes they are different, but I think that one and r284941 (MFC'ed to > stable/10 as r285793) should have addressed all possible situations. : When TCP socket goes to LAST_ACK state & remote host do not respone : ACK forever, socket would stay at LAST_ACK forever and never be : removed. This situation too? Regardless of zero window condition?