Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:16:02 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Bakken, Luke" <Luke.Bakken@getronics.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: perl 5.8.2 memory leak? Message-ID: <20040122061602.GA56369@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <407DF7D68DD30440B5CEB70ED234D1CF02FCAA7D@excuswa100.americas.unity> References: <407DF7D68DD30440B5CEB70ED234D1CF02FCAA7D@excuswa100.americas.unity>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:12:37PM -0800, Bakken, Luke wrote: > > > If I can provide any more assistance or info, please ask. >=20 > > Take this up with the perl developers; FreeBSD does not maintain the pe= rl software. >=20 > > Kris >=20 > I am aware of that, however since it appears that potentially a > change in the way the package is built might fix the problem, I > thought I'd mention it to the ports mailing list. Is this not the > place to discuss how packages are built? Yes..it wasn't clear to me that you were suggesting that the changed malloc implementation might be to blame, but even if it was it's still a perl bug. Kris --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAD2qiWry0BWjoQKURApdZAJ0YyD7dr9HYicS5XIncKKG6LoaHVwCfSvt6 UbpxQBE2SBYm1Z7uRyTBotE= =eWPV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040122061602.GA56369>