From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 16:41:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C92A16A4D7; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:41:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E84F43D5A; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:41:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id CC3D3146F9; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:41:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:41:29 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Edwin Groothuis In-Reply-To: <20040109002854.GA1667@k7.mavetju> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Hye-Shik Chang cc: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:41:31 -0000 > Can we change the owner of a PR to python now just like the java@ > and gnome@ PRs and lists? Recently when the perl@ mailing list was created, there was discussion about assigning all the perl ports to it. I objected at that time, saying that there was a canonical name for "unmaintained" and that was "ports@FreeBSD.org". I think the consensus was that only the critical (for some definition of critical) PRs would be so assigned. My own research shows me that PRs assigned to kde, gnome, emulation, and phoenix, tend to rot. The java folks are a little more focussed and thus tend to be better. mcl