From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 19 15:20:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D1716A41F; Fri, 19 May 2006 15:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7DD43D45; Fri, 19 May 2006 15:20:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from [212.40.38.87] (oddity-e.topspin.kiev.ua [212.40.38.87]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id SAA29490; Fri, 19 May 2006 18:20:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Message-ID: <446DE254.50103@icyb.net.ua> Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 18:20:52 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060512) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <446DD5EB.6030300@icyb.net.ua> <200605191116.06248.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200605191116.06248.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4=>6.1 regression: nforce2 vs. APIC [+fix] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:20:55 -0000 on 19/05/2006 18:16 John Baldwin said the following: > On Friday 19 May 2006 10:27, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> [Disclaimer, just in case: I do mean APIC, not ACPI] >> >> This is a good lesson for me for not trying any RCs or BETAs in due time. >> >> Short description of my system: nforce2 based motherboard NF-7 v2 with >> the latest BIOS (v2.7), CPU is Athlon XP. >> >> ... >> >> Based on that info and the linux patch in that thread I came up with the >> following PCI fixup. Now I am running 6.1 with both APIC and "C1 >> disconnect" enabled for 2 days without any problems. > > Good find! The patch looks good. I've modified it slight to expand > the comment and to make it more paranoid and only trigger for > bus/slot/function 0/0/0 like the post mentions along with a minor > tweak to the printf. Can you test to make sure I didn't break anything in the > process? Jon, sure, where can I find your version of the patch ? :-) -- Andriy Gapon