From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 11:55:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@www.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E5016A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:55:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk) Received: from mail.helenmarks.co.uk (mail.helenmarks.co.uk [82.68.196.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E83D43D53 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:55:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.helenmarks.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA2A22241F; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:55:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.helenmarks.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.helenmarks.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50374-02; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:55:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from egg.helenmarks.co.uk (egg.helenmarks.co.uk [192.168.15.3]) by mail.helenmarks.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD4022241E; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:55:14 +0100 (BST) From: Dominic Marks Organization: GoodforBusiness.co.uk To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:56:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506091256.54022.dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: By ClamAV 0.80 Cc: Goran Gajic , jmg@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@www.freebsd.org Subject: Re: RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:55:24 -0000 On Thursday 09 June 2005 12:42, Goran Gajic wrote: > Hi, > > RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive > (jmg: I cc'd you on the off chance you have not seen this already, another user identified your changes as related, but I have not tested this myself.) Yes, it seems that changes to the kernel (specifically kqueue?) broke NFS (and other things) in -STABLE. See these messages for related reports. 1 <20050608002333.73758.qmail@web26206.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> 2 <20050609013258.GB85828@blazingdot.com> HTH, -- Dominic GoodforBusiness.co.uk I.T. Services for SMEs in the UK.