From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 08:46:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAA98C31; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59C3EE13; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id u56so15125055wes.10; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:46:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=gCjT1o1sgtT0LLGN9Gw57oMpoga7QHqAmhloJZcvyws=; b=G+UBO2x2Ob4P+kP6G+BE9Yhj1Tb6uPkv/x8cRd/rqKBFcUXVlVRrHSV6cFHoWXKqb9 RP8OtN3TZ84bZTh26H49p16ExyhZCAnxXeZzyWhja41HFBRDGH7iaeAMFxEx2su4fDPw sKvc85KHQA1+flib0ptXqWbsNP4A0bLOjJWu0DC4BkKHJItK75Dswv1FY4VYWqk1l4ZM HGFns+za7DPar1y988i/bTVVSurLiLpeAyvmfMt01nQECduFU6/iA9VGl6jqlbxDuG/K 2Pc8FR9zhtPZmEVJjR3LuuitSAG7qKpgoihpixWARzhrN4apwrxWnVA6rdqLq5A7Jlrr ZVhw== X-Received: by 10.194.23.39 with SMTP id j7mr16343722wjf.9.1423817169736; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:46:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id do1sm2002147wib.3.2015.02.13.00.46.08 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:46:08 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:46:06 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Ian Lepore Subject: Re: [RFC] Removin the old make Message-ID: <20150213084606.GM29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <201502122349.t1CNnD43027915@fire.js.berklix.net> <20150213002456.GK29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <1423788447.80968.123.camel@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MqkwUViToTQK+HjE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1423788447.80968.123.camel@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: arch@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" , current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:46:11 -0000 --MqkwUViToTQK+HjE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:47:27PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 01:24 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:49:13AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >=20 > > > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure= for tha=3D > > > > t I > > > > want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove = the old =3D > > > .................................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > make > > > > =3D66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th. > > > >=20 > > > > Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10. > > > > FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installat= ion. > > > >=20 > > > > Best regards, > > > > Bapt > > >=20 > > > I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to > > > remove old make without notice ? > > >=20 > > Old make was already removed in 10.x what remains is only the sources a= nd that > > is what I propose to remove from 11 (and only from 11) > >=20 > > Best regards, > > Bapt >=20 > fmake exists as a port too, doesn't it? That's what I vaguely remember > as the plan... bmake available in 9, it's the default in 10 but fmake > source is still around, and then in 11 fmake is gone from base but > available as a port. >=20 Yes it is in port for sure. Bapt --MqkwUViToTQK+HjE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTduc4ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzrIQCeMb2V6jynVUmS41XXqYyj9gke 65YAniw8ww4DpS4O47zueKz8QDa4vHmc =TPb/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MqkwUViToTQK+HjE--