From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 21:21:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF52116A4BF for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (hueytecuilhuitl.mtu.ru [195.34.32.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FCF43F3F for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:21:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru) Received: from ciam.ru (ppp132-74.dialup.mtu-net.ru [62.118.132.74]) by hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305AEFB4A6; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:21:52 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru) Message-ID: <3F653E66.9040601@ciam.ru> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:21:58 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030827 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20030914153245.79ba8838.tkato@prontomail.com> <3F644E7A.1040806@fillmore-labs.com> <20030914230644.447e9891.tkato@prontomail.com> <3F6479F7.6040706@fillmore-labs.com> <20030915023557.5434f58c.tkato@prontomail.com> <3F64D002.5010605@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <3F64D002.5010605@fillmore-labs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: KATO Tsuguru Subject: Re: PRs ports/56767...56858 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 04:21:56 -0000 Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > KATO Tsuguru wrote: >> The function you want is availabe if "ECHO_MSG=${ECHO}" is >> added to /etc/make.conf. Perhaps this way is appropriate >> to become default value.... > > > Hmmm... I consider it silly if a port tells me > 'YOU CAN BUILD ME WITH THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS' if I just do > a makesum or checksum. Most of the ports save me their > messages, but tell me when something goes wrong. It does not > work with every port, but I would like it if bento > builds with -s by default, that will save us the > repeated option reminders on a lot of ports. > > Redefining ECHO_MSG is definetively bad, because it kills > every error message. Agree. I think we need to have different ECHO* command: for ports system messages and errors, and port specific notify messages. It's not obviously now what I need to use ECHO, ECHO_CMD or ECHO_MSG and when. -- Sem.