Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Feb 1997 17:16:08 -0800 (PST)
From:      "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
To:        craig@ProGroup.com (Craig Shaver)
Cc:        mcwong@hotmail.com, questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: UltraSPARC and MicroSPARC vs Pentium Pro ?
Message-ID:  <199702130116.RAA08306@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <330205BC.446B9B3D@ProGroup.com> from "Craig Shaver" at Feb 12, 97 10:02:37 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Craig Shaver wrote:
> 
> I don't care about your benchmarks that much.  How mission critical is
> the application?  I have set up Sun Enterprise and SparcStations to use
> as web servers and the like.  A lot will depend on the usage of the www
> server.  If it is imperative that the server be available *all* of the
> time, I would go with the Sun equipment.  This has nothing to do with
> processor speed, or the differences between Solaris and FreeBSD.  Intel
> equipment varies by manufacturer to manufacturer.  The Sun stuff that I
> have worked with just keeps on going.  
> 
> However, if the server is not that mission critical, and you are not
> hitting it with huge amounts of cgi, then go with the Intel stuff.  Just
> take some time to pick some good equipment.  Talk to this guy about
> buying the right parts:
> 
> "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>

	BUY the machine from Rod.  his charges are very reasonable.
	the machine will be rock solid.

	much better than buying an overpriced underperforming sun.
jmb



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702130116.RAA08306>