Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:56:35 +0100
From:      Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>
To:        Clement Laforet <clement@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/88233: [new port] net/py-dpkt, a Python package for (dis)assembly of network packets.
Message-ID:  <20060123095635.GB72879@isis.sigpipe.cz>
In-Reply-To: <200511062021.jA6KLLwG022260@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200511062021.jA6KLLwG022260@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# clement@FreeBSD.org / 2005-11-06 20:21:21 +0000:
> Synopsis: [new port] net/py-dpkt, a Python package for (dis)assembly of network packets.
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: clement
> State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 6 20:19:52 GMT 2005
> State-Changed-Why: 
> Your conditions are unacceptable, so we have to reject your 
> contribution. Even if the port doesn't need to be reworked, we can't 
> guarantee no one will ever touch your work. portmgr and secteam 
> members, or any committer who makes a large sweeping commit, may modify 
> your port.                        
> 
> Of course, if you remove this clause, I'm sure a committer will add it  
> to the ports tree.                                           

    The disclaimer at the beginning of the shar and the text of the PR
    were meant to stress the (then current) policy as written in the
    porters-handbook and the developers-handbook. The policy was IMO
    commonly breached by committers, and I wanted it to be obeyed since
    it nicely matched my views.  If the text read something else to you,
    sorry, I blame my being an ESL person.

    The policy changed in the meantime and I have no interest in
    maintaining any FreeBSD ports under the new one. I understand,
    however, that I can submit the port with my address in MAINTAINER,
    and drop the maintainership after the port passed the package
    building cluster or similar.  If that's (still) the case, and if the
    disclaimer means something elase to you from what it means to me,
    consider it retracted, and feel free to commit the port.
    I'm willing to be listed as the MAINTAINER of the port for the
    minimal required period under the conditions written in
    porters-handbook rev 1.673 and contributing-ports rev 1.1.

-- 
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man.  You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE.             http://bash.org/?255991



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060123095635.GB72879>