Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:40:42 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: What to do with Mozilla Message-ID: <20031015194042.GA781@ns1.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <1066241563.721.27.camel@gyros> References: <1066241563.721.27.camel@gyros>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:12:44PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > As some of you may be aware, Mozilla 1.5 was released today (along with > Firebird and Thunderbird updates which will be handled soon). The > question is, what do we do with Mozilla 1.4.x? Do you resurrect > mozilla-vendor to hold 1.4.x for a while, or do we just update > www/mozilla to 1.5, and say "to hell" with 1.4.x? Note, 1.6a is due out > shortly as well, and mozilla-devel will be updated to that. I would suggest to resurrect mozilla-vendor for as long as it takes bento to iterate over all the ports. That way you have a trivial band-aid "fix" in case something does break. If nothing breaks, then mozilla-vendor can be put in the attic again after having lived for as short as a couple of days. If something did break then it lives for as long as it takes to fix the breakage. The name (ie mozilla-vendor) does not have to match common parctice or does not have to be intuitive. The port is not created to be used. it's created as a safety-net. You might as well call it mozilla-oops. My $0.02 -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031015194042.GA781>