From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 26 07:49:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3562237B404 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 07:49:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF70F43FAF for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 07:49:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149F71FFBAC for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:49:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 33FB01FFBA7; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:49:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id E7A8315368; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D711529B for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:48:08 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=USER_AGENT_PINE autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Subject: dump -L / restore question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:49:11 -0000 Hi, I had tried a full dump , newfs and retore cycle on one of my HEAD machine. As the file systems were mounted I used dump -L. On restore I got one of these per file system: expected next file 23553, got 7809 I know what this meens (according to man pages and sources [though the assumption that next incremental will pick it in restore sources is a bit misleading as if this is the last dump this will not happen at the time we restore ;-) ]). My question is a) why does this still happen with -L ? Is this ok ? b) as this is excatly one single file per file system - what is it ? -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/