Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 06:09:33 +0900 From: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Paul Armstrong <freebsd-ports@otoh.org> Subject: Re: Differences between ports build and poudriere Message-ID: <PSAPR03MB56393C5E985999337E908C60FAAD9@PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <PSAPR03MB5639A642A4B6B7D565A12CB8FAAB9@PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <7CB64EC1-FF13-4033-9691-0C191853EA47@otoh.org> <PSAPR03MB5639A642A4B6B7D565A12CB8FAAB9@PSAPR03MB5639.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I write optimistically in reference to the ports I maintain, but it seems very difficult to port a build by Bazel. Only port of games/anki exist that are built by Bazel, but there are a lot of patches. It looks like it would be better to do something about the http_archive and http_file in the WORKSPACE file. However, if the WORKSPACE file recurses further from there, there appears to be nothing that can be done. Well however I just saw Bazel yesterday :) Regards. Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2022/06/13 19:47:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?PSAPR03MB56393C5E985999337E908C60FAAD9>