Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:28:43 +0200
From:      Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: More if_ath churn coming your way! 
Message-ID:  <E1PgiCZ-0000hL-Dy@clue.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikWQ4G6P-ePSDv6eXpUfnZ7vvDTSqSGr5sB4Pxe@mail.gmail.com> 
References:  <AANLkTikWQ4G6P-ePSDv6eXpUfnZ7vvDTSqSGr5sB4Pxe@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikBpHcimOvSGdppc9CdhWguZNbTUEwan%2BQ172QT@mail.gmail.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
> > if_ath code into -HEAD.
> 
> Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in
> all the code was just shuffled around a bit.
> 
> Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd
> really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets
> would test this out and get back to me.

Oddly enough, I think my AR9285 uses less power now.  This I do
know however: at boot, it associates much much faster.  I used to
have to wait at least 10 seconds for "the default route interface".
Now, association and DHCP blazes through without pausing.

Ian

-- 
Ian Freislich



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1PgiCZ-0000hL-Dy>