From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 24 23:04:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7F516A40B for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:04:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: from mail.transactionware.com (mail.transactionware.com [203.14.245.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F6D013C46C for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:04:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: (qmail 63098 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2007 23:04:25 -0000 Received: from midgard.transactionware.com (192.168.1.55) by dm.transactionware.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2007 23:04:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 88157 invoked by uid 907); 24 Mar 2007 23:04:02 -0000 Received: from midgard.transactionware.com (HELO IBMA618C20271E) (192.168.1.55) by midgard.transactionware.com (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 09:04:02 +1000 From: "Jan Mikkelsen" To: "'Nikolas Britton'" , "'Phillip Neumann'" Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 09:03:58 +1000 Message-ID: <000201c76e68$b5339820$0502a8c0@IBMA618C20271E> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6822 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Thread-Index: AcdtuM8jcAQ8hNYgSG2VPiQhgkBeUAAr4bkg Cc: 'FreeBSD Stable' , erich@areca.com.tw, scottl@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Amd64 Unstable Areca X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:04:06 -0000 Hi, Nikolas Britton wrote: > If that doesn't work move back down to 1.20.00.12: > http://www.nbritton.org/uploads/areca/ I could consistently make 1.20.00.12 corrupt data. If you are going to go back, that's probably a bad choice. 1.20.00.02 didn't seem to have corruption problems. Regards, Jan.