From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 20:01:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33FA1065672 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au) Received: from mail2.riverwillow.net.au (ns2.riverwillow.net.au [203.58.93.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B848FC36 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au) Received: from rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au (rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au [172.25.24.168]) by mail2.riverwillow.net.au (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB2Jjqio028631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 06:45:52 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mB2JjqHS045527 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 06:45:52 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au) Received: (from john@localhost) by rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id mB2JjpAT045526 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 06:45:51 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from john) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 06:45:51 +1100 From: John Marshall To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <20081202194551.GC45319@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au> Mail-Followup-To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <20081202180743.GB70240@hades.panopticon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081202180743.GB70240@hades.panopticon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Key: http://www.riverwillow.net.au/certs/pgp/johnmarshall.asc X-PGP-KeyID: 0xA29A84A2 Subject: Re: Proposal: mechanism for local patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:01:02 -0000 On Tue, 02 Dec 2008, 21:07 +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > I think the most convenient way of implementing this is having > a directory hierarchy (either two level ${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/patch-*) > or single level ${PORTNAME}/patch-*) and a single variable that makes > port system look there for patches in addition to ${PATCHDIR}. Or keep local patches under /var/db/ports/ rather than building a new tree? -- John Marshall