From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 10:02:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E522106566C for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sat@cenkes.org) Received: from heka.cenkes.org (heka.cenkes.org [208.79.80.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E2B8FC37 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sat@cenkes.org) Received: from amilo.cenkes.org (ppp85-140-148-5.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [85.140.148.5]) (Authenticated sender: sat) by heka.cenkes.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 648F0242F856; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:02:40 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:02:37 +0400 From: Andrew Pantyukhin To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20080402100235.GF4692@amilo.cenkes.org> References: <20080402032721.62016mpa11vodpc0@mail.top-consulting.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: freebsd@top-consulting.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:02:42 -0000 On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 12:55:58AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > It is that it's impossible to limit INCOMING bandwidth from the > Internet. The fact is you can limit incoming TCP with little to no packet loss and almost any other traffic stream (including P2P) with 1-10% loss. > In short, the bandwidth limiting code really has little > practical value when implemented in FreeBSD that is why few do > it. :)