Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 20:05:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ed_start() panic revisited Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.92.960413200409.206W-100000@freebsd.ki.net> In-Reply-To: <199604132353.QAA05980@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 13 Apr 1996, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Just had an ed_start() panic tonight, after compiling a new
> > kernel and forgetting to recompile the if_ed.c module without -O
> > enabled (as per Julian's suggestion)
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > 316
> > 317 switch (type) {
> > 318 case T_PAGEFLT: /* page fault */
> > 319 (void) trap_pfault(&frame, FALSE);
> > 320 return;
> > 321
> > 322 case T_PROTFLT: /* general protection fault */
> > 323 case T_SEGNPFLT: /* segment not present fault */
> >
> >
> > Julian had suggested recompiling the if_ed.c module seperately from
> > the rest, without -O enabled, to see if that made a difference, as the
> > original core dump seemed to show everything was okay. Without -O enabled,
> > the system seems to run okay (well, other then the rlist panics, of course),
> > but with -O enabled, it dies after several hours.
> >
> > Is there anything i can do on my end to figure out the difference
> > between the optimized vs non-optimized if_ed.o module in order to correct
> > this problem? Some sort of 'diff' between the object files maybe?
>
> volatile frame? type?
>
Ignorantly, he inquires...Huh?
Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net
Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.92.960413200409.206W-100000>