From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 25 08:35:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0EB106566B for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873348FC22 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D192F41C650; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:35:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HTTGsV-YbZX6; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 82AAF41C67B; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D2F44487F; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:31:44 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Jase Thew In-Reply-To: <49027EA9.9090808@beardz.net> Message-ID: <20081025083021.S2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <49027EA9.9090808@beardz.net> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Succesful patch on several hosts with RELENG_7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:35:07 -0000 On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, Jase Thew wrote: Hi, > Is this patch for both i386 and amd64, or just i386? the patch should be architecture independent. There was some alignment concern lately for non-itellish architectures but it should be right (not yet verified). So amd64 and i386 are not a problem, both work, ... /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.