From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 21 23:51:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D3116A421 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:51:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB3943D9E for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:51:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jALNs8b68132; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:54:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , "Free BSD Questions list" Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:51:06 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <64B3924A-3A8B-4198-8F18-2C561DED5AA2@shire.net> Importance: Normal Cc: kayo.granillo@sun.com Subject: RE: Solaris patches and Solaris Express X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:51:35 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Chad >Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC >Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 7:01 AM >To: Free BSD Questions list >Cc: kayo.granillo@sun.com >Subject: Re: Solaris patches and Solaris Express > > > >On Nov 19, 2005, at 2:02 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >>> Indeed. But this is not Solaris 10 - thats when all of this changed. >>> >> >> I never understood why anyone would go to Solaris 10 unless they had a >> 64 bit processor and compiled all their apps under a 64 bit compiler. >> Sun >> didn't either, which is why they originally didn't come out with a >> Solaris x86 >> version of Solaris 10 They only came out with it after much >> screaming. > >I run it (Solaris 10) on a dual Athlon 2800+ MP box. As a server. >No X-Windows. To run java. And it runs java better than the same >box did with Linux and the sun jvm. Is the Java version your running restricted to Solaris 10 and above? Is Solaris 10 faster/stabler with Java than older Solaris versions? Ted