From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 23 23:58:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292F516A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 23:58:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC0143D4C for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 23:58:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iANNwsQ0019561; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:58:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iANNwsfk019560; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:58:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:58:54 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20041123235854.GA19517@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <20041123221629.GE56261@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041123231936.GA18847@ns1.xcllnt.net> <20041123233407.GA73561@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041123233407.GA73561@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ports-ia64@pointyhat.freebsd.org: xorg-fonts-type1-6.7.0 failed on ia64 6] X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 23:58:55 -0000 On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 03:34:07PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > I built xorg just yesterday on my -current ia64. No problems. > > Can you check if the port was built on pluto1 or pluto2? > > xorg-clients was built on pluto2. Ok, thanks. > > pluto1 runs 5.3-stable, whereas pluto2 runs 6-current. I think > > a 6-current chroot on a 5.3-stable machine is not a good idea > > and a 5.3-stable chroot on a 6-current machine is questionable. > > Unless there are ia64-specific incompatibilities or bugs, going both > ways should be fine at the moment, and in particular it shouldn't > matter whether the package was compiled under a 6.x kernel or a 5.x > kernel as long as the userland is the same. There's nothing ia64 specific, but there are various generic changes that possibly affect ports. Enough to make me feel uncomfortable to mix and match and why I have one on -stable and the other on -current. > There's the usual instability on pluto* though, so perhaps the package > was affected by some form of data corruption during the build. Yes, possible. I'm building xorg on pluto2 as we speak. It's probably a fluke however... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net