From owner-cvs-all Wed Aug 23 9:49:24 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B721337B43C; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from billy-club.village.org (billy-club.village.org [10.0.0.3]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA65818; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:49:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@billy-club.village.org) Received: from billy-club.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by billy-club.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA02382; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:48:19 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200008231648.KAA02382@billy-club.village.org> To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/games/fortune/datfiles fortunes Cc: Josef Karthauser , "David O'Brien" , Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven , Peter Wemm , Doug Barton , Ade Lovett , Jonathan Lemon , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:04:00 MDT." <200008231604.KAA11402@nomad.yogotech.com> References: <200008231604.KAA11402@nomad.yogotech.com> <20000814003636.A74639@pavilion.net> <200008140753.AAA08038@netplex.com.au> <20000819124824.E88550@lucifer.bart.nl> <20000822161835.B807@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000823091714.D650@pavilion.net> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:48:19 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : > The per-commit id is also going in. Question is what kind of format : > if should be. It could be an integer counter, or a YYYYMMDD-CID (commit : > id) type. Preferences? : : The latter, unless you've figured out a way to have the counter updated : on a per-branch basis. (Counters should only be incremented when a file : on that branch is touched, else keeping track of the 'state' of the tree : is too difficult.) Actually, having a strict incremental counter is fine, even with branching. If I make a commit to branch X that is number 100, an then 20 commits happen on the main line, and than I make another commit on branch X (now commit number 121) branch X happens to be the same for numbers 100-120, but I don't see that being a big deal. I don't think we need per branch counters and they would just confuse things. But then again, I've used perforce and like their change number for a good "rough" incremental "tag". Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message