From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 14 10:34:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA03320 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 14 Aug 1998 10:34:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA03315 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 1998 10:34:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id LAA24664; Fri, 14 Aug 1998 11:33:31 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199808141733.LAA24664@lariat.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1.0.44 (Beta) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 11:33:25 -0600 To: Mike Smith From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: 64-bit time_t Cc: Mike Smith , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199808141024.KAA13339@word.smith.net.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:24 AM 8/14/98 +0000, Mike Smith wrote: >> Don't want to get into language wars here, but in case the current rash >> of security problems doesn't make it painfully obvious, C isn't a good >> tool for ANYTHING. > >... which is why it's been a perfectly good tool for the last couple of >decades. Language has nothing to do with security, in case it wasn't >already plainly obvious. Security is a design issue. Security is also a safety issue. Use safe tools, and you're less likely to create security holes. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message