From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 7 16:10:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE7116A4CF for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:10:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E40B43D39 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:10:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fj@panix.com) Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7761F98332; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 12:10:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fj@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i87GAlr21352; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 12:10:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 12:10:47 -0400 From: Joe Altman To: Nico Meijer Message-ID: <20040907161047.GA18878@panix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Altman , Nico Meijer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <7A727F81-FCE2-11D8-8BE7-000A95EFF4CA@foolishgames.com> <008901c4934e$a7c5b260$0200000a@SAGEAME> <413B5F14.6090405@zonnet.nl> <200409051452.06236.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> <413C0FAE.1000502@zonnet.nl> <20040907003500.GA11100@panix.com> <413D39D7.6050009@zonnet.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <413D39D7.6050009@zonnet.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [another "me too"] Re: portindex/portindexdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 16:10:48 -0000 On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 06:32:23AM +0200, Nico Meijer wrote: > Hi Joe, > > >Sigh: > > Lighten up! ;-) Heh....thanks, I will. > >/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:587: > >[BUG] Bus Error > >ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-freebsd4] > > Have you tried replacing the portsdb-sequence with `portindex && > portindexdb`? Not yet; but I will. I was reading over the thread(s) mentioned by racerx last night. > So: > > - cvsup (or whatever tool you use) > - portindex > - portindexdb > - portversion -vL = (or whatever switches you use) > > The upside to using portindex is that it merges changes instead of > building the entire index every time. So your first run will take quite > some time, but your following runs will run quite a bit faster. Ah....I see now the advantage. That is nice. Thanks. --