Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:30:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [roam@ringlet.net: Re: ports/30396: LPRng port has a checksum mismatch and patch.aj doesn't apply cleanly] Message-ID: <200109121530.f8CFU2N39746@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/30396; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: desmo@bandwidth.org Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: [roam@ringlet.net: Re: ports/30396: LPRng port has a checksum mismatch and patch.aj doesn't apply cleanly] Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:20:11 +0300 Oh, and maybe it would help if I actually CC'd the LPRng port maintainer on this one :) G'luck, Peter -- If wishes were fishes, the antecedent of this conditional would be true. ----- Forwarded message from Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> ----- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:10:03 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Subject: Re: ports/30396: LPRng port has a checksum mismatch and patch.aj doesn't apply cleanly The following reply was made to PR ports/30396; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Shaun Jurrens <sjurrens@no.tiscali.com> Cc: sada@FreeBSD.org, sju@wol.no, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/30396: LPRng port has a checksum mismatch and patch.aj doesn't apply cleanly Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:04:41 +0300 On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 11:07:44AM +0200, Shaun Jurrens wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 02:10:16PM -0700, sada@FreeBSD.org wrote: > #> Synopsis: LPRng port has a checksum mismatch and patch.aj doesn't apply cleanly > #> > #> State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed > #> State-Changed-By: sada > #> State-Changed-When: Sun Sep 9 14:07:52 PDT 2001 > #> State-Changed-Why: > #> Couldn't repeat on my 4.4-RC. > #> Please report your md5 of distfile. > #> > #> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=30396 > > MD5 (LPRng-3.7.5.tgz) = fcb4300e64d4f0528f05c77e5cc031e1 I just staged a little experiment: I fetched LPRng from all its MASTER_SITES (except for the sage-au.org.au one - I could not establish a data connection with it). Here are the results, all those files are LPRng-3.7.5.tgz named after the respective site. [roam@south:p0 /usr/ports/distfiles/lp]$ ls -l total 19728 -rw-r--r-- 1 roam wheel 3358292 2 Ρεο 23:42 astart.com.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 roam wheel 3358292 2 Ρεο 23:42 lprng.com.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 roam wheel 3358292 3 Ρεο 03:42 ufl.edu.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 roam wheel 3358292 3 Ρεο 04:42 umn.edu.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 roam wheel 3358292 2 Ρεο 21:42 uni-hamburg.de.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 roam wheel 3358292 2 Ρεο 21:42 uni-paderborn.de.tar.gz [roam@south:p0 /usr/ports/distfiles/lp]$ md5 * MD5 (astart.com.tar.gz) = fcb4300e64d4f0528f05c77e5cc031e1 MD5 (lprng.com.tar.gz) = fcb4300e64d4f0528f05c77e5cc031e1 MD5 (ufl.edu.tar.gz) = fcb4300e64d4f0528f05c77e5cc031e1 MD5 (umn.edu.tar.gz) = fcb4300e64d4f0528f05c77e5cc031e1 MD5 (uni-hamburg.de.tar.gz) = fcb4300e64d4f0528f05c77e5cc031e1 MD5 (uni-paderborn.de.tar.gz) = fcb4300e64d4f0528f05c77e5cc031e1 [roam@south:p0 /usr/ports/distfiles/lp]$ Seems like the distfile was rerolled at some point in time, and now all the mirrors are carrying the new one. If the port maintainer has a copy of the old distfile, could it be compared against the new one? If there are no differences, could this checksum change be committed before the (second) ports freeze for 4.4-RELEASE? :) G'luck, Peter -- The rest of this sentence is written in Thailand, on To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message ----- End forwarded message ----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109121530.f8CFU2N39746>